Principles of behavioral economics, including inertia, loss aversion, choice overload, and relative social ranking, have been applied to motivate personal health decisions, retirement planning, and savings behavior. However, they have been largely ignored in healthcare, specifically in regard to the design of physician incentive programs.
Can behavioral economics be applied in healthcare?
Applying behavioral economics principles to physician incentives was the subject of research conducted by Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, et al., in the study, “Using Behavioral Economics to Design Physician Incentives That Deliver High-Value Care[1]”. That research provides anecdotal examples of successful programs that tie behavioral economic principles to incentives for physicians to deliver high-value care. The authors recognize that rigorous evaluation of infrastructure changes and incentives are needed to design payment systems that result in high-quality, cost-conscious care.
Do micro-incentives drive cost savings decisions among providers?
The incentive platforms and programs in the market today are narrowly focused on gaps in care and coding strategies, with the goal of impacting revenue versus medical spend. Unfortunately, this limited approach doesn’t inspire change in physician practice or referral patterns.
Other solutions, such as “EMR Nudgers” and clinical decision support (CDS) tools, have the benefit of being directly channeled into the EMR and provider workflow, but they lack the personalized content and programming needed to drive behavior change.
Other tools that are focused simplifying utilization management and prior authorization, such as site of service optimizers, attempt to drive provider behavior via penalties versus reward.
By leveraging behavioral economics to offer personalized ‘carrots’, instead of ‘sticks’, it becomes possible to reframe the payer-provider relationship and displace the inefficient and ineffective models mentioned above.